November 2005 Archives

Apple - You are a Sly Dog

| | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0)

For my Christmas present this year, I went out and bought the Apple iPod with video. I really hadn't been happy with my Dell DJ due to their abandonment of my model, and once the video iPod came out, I decided to make the leap. I've been very happy with it, the audio and screen quality are great and I love how easy it is to keep in sync using iTunes.

However, when I tried using a standard RCA to mini-jack cable (the ones that commonly come with camcorders) to watch video from my iPod onto the television, I found that it didn't work.

After a quick search, I found this article that details what I needed to do. Basically, all Apple did was send the video down the red ended cables, which is traditionally for one of the audio channels. Yes, that's right, they swapped the red and yellow ends on the cables, be still my beating heart. All that I needed to do was move the red cable into the video-in jack (typically the yellow one) and viola!

I'm sure Apple did this in an attempt to make people by their $20 proprietary cables and I'll bet that some not-so-savy folks out there will fall for the bait, but come on!! Why does is Apple so absolutely resistant to standards, especially on stupid stuff like RCA cables?

links for 2005-12-01

| | TrackBacks (1)

links for 2005-11-30

| | TrackBacks (0)

Wish List Additions.

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

I think I'm going to add each of these books to my wish list.

links for 2005-11-29

| | TrackBacks (0)

Child Seats

| | TrackBacks (0)

In Pennsylvania, children ages 2-7 must use booster seats when traveling in a vehicle or face a fine of up to $100. The booster seat pretty much raises the child to the height of a sitting adult and therefore make the seat belt fit better. The costs of the booster seat runs anywhere from $35 to over $200. I've often wondered the effectiveness of the seats. I found this article today from the New York Times Magazine addressing the issue. The "Freakonomics" columns are a spin-off of the book "Freakonomics", which basically looks at several issues in society from different angles in an attempt to explain them (I highly recommend the book & have a copy of it if anyone is interested).

Anyway, the column looks at the raw data and suggests that booster seats don't perform any better than a child restrained via a seat belt.

iTunes - Why No Multiple "Skip When Shuffling"??

| | TrackBacks (0)

I just spent about 30 minutes in iTunes selecting individual files, going into their properties, and then checking the "Skip when Shuffling" checkbox (most of the files were audio book files that shouldn't play when I'm listening to the entire shuffled collection). My question is: Why doesn't Apple have this option appear on the screen that shows up when you try to make changes to multiple songs? I mean, the screen already exists so you can change artists, albums, etc... for multiple selections, so why not include the "Skip when Shuffling" checkbox? It's clearly something that needs to be done in the next version.

links for 2005-11-26

| | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-24

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-23

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-22

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Text From John Murtha's Iraq Speech

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

The Honorable John P. Murtha
War in Iraq (Full Text of Speech)
November 17th, 2005

(Washington D.C.)- The war in Iraq is not going as advertised. It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion. The American public is way ahead of us. The United States and coalition troops have done all they can in Iraq, but it is time for a change in direction. Our military is suffering. The future of our country is at risk. We can not continue on the present course. It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf Region.

General Casey said in a September 2005 Hearing, "the perception of occupation in Iraq is a major driving force behind the insurgency." General Abizaid said on the same date, "Reducing the size and visibility of the coalition forces in Iraq is a part of our counterinsurgency strategy."

For 2 ˝ years I have been concerned about the U.S. policy and the plan in Iraq. I have addressed my concerns with the Administration and the Pentagon and have spoken out in public about my concerns. The main reason for going to war has been discredited. A few days before the start of the war I was in Kuwait—the military drew a red line around Baghdad and said when U.S. forces cross that line they will be attacked by the Iraqis with Weapons of Mass Destruction—but the US forces said they were prepared. They had well trained forces with the appropriate protective gear.

We spend more money on Intelligence than all the countries in the world together, and more on Intelligence than most countries GDP. But the intelligence concerning Iraq was wrong. It is not a world intelligence failure. It is a U.S. intelligence failure and the way that intelligence was misused.

I have been visiting our wounded troops at Bethesda and Walter Reed hospitals almost every week since the beginning of the War. And what demoralizes them is going to war with not enough troops and equipment to make the transition to peace; the devastation caused by IEDs; being deployed to Iraq when their homes have been ravaged by hurricanes; being on their second or third deployment and leaving their families behind without a network of support.

The threat posed by terrorism is real, but we have other threats that cannot be ignored. We must be prepared to face all threats. The future of our military is at risk. Our military and their families are stretched thin. Many say that the Army is broken. Some of our troops are on their third deployment. Recruitment is down, even as our military has lowered its standards. Defense budgets are being cut. Personnel costs are skyrocketing, particularly in health care. Choices will have to be made. We can not allow promises we have made to our military families in terms of service benefits, in terms of their health care, to be negotiated away. Procurement programs that ensure our military dominance cannot be negotiated away. We must be prepared. The war in Iraq has caused huge shortfalls at our bases in the U.S.

Much of our ground equipment is worn out and in need of either serious overhaul or replacement. George Washington said, "To be prepared for war is one of the most effective means of preserving peace." We must rebuild our Army. Our deficit is growing out of control. The Director of the Congressional Budget Office recently admitted to being "terrified" about the budget deficit in the coming decades. This is the first prolonged war we have fought with three years of tax cuts, without full mobilization of American industry and without a draft. The burden of this war has not been shared equally; the military and their families are shouldering this burden.

Our military has been fighting a war in Iraq for over two and a half years. Our military has accomplished its mission and done its duty. Our military captured Saddam Hussein, and captured or killed his closest associates. But the war continues to intensify. Deaths and injuries are growing, with over 2,079 confirmed American deaths. Over 15,500 have been seriously injured and it is estimated that over 50,000 will suffer from battle fatigue. There have been reports of at least 30,000 Iraqi civilian deaths.

I just recently visited Anbar Province Iraq in order to assess the conditions on the ground. Last May 2005, as part of the Emergency Supplemental Spending Bill, the House included the Moran Amendment, which was accepted in Conference, and which required the Secretary of Defense to submit quarterly reports to Congress in order to more accurately measure stability and security in Iraq. We have now received two reports. I am disturbed by the findings in key indicator areas. Oil production and energy production are below pre-war levels. Our reconstruction efforts have been crippled by the security situation. Only $9 billion of the $18 billion appropriated for reconstruction has been spent. Unemployment remains at about 60 percent. Clean water is scarce. Only $500 million of the $2.2 billion appropriated for water projects has been spent. And most importantly, insurgent incidents have increased from about 150 per week to over 700 in the last year. Instead of attacks going down over time and with the addition of more troops, attacks have grown dramatically. Since the revelations at Abu Ghraib, American casualties have doubled. An annual State Department report in 2004 indicated a sharp increase in global terrorism.

I said over a year ago, and now the military and the Administration agrees, Iraq can not be won "militarily." I said two years ago, the key to progress in Iraq is to Iraqitize, Internationalize and Energize. I believe the same today. But I have concluded that the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq is impeding this progress.

Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency. They are united against U.S. forces and we have become a catalyst for violence. U.S. troops are the common enemy of the Sunnis, Saddamists and foreign jihadists. I believe with a U.S. troop redeployment, the Iraqi security forces will be incentivized to take control. A poll recently conducted shows that over 80% of Iraqis are strongly opposed to the presence of coalition troops, and about 45% of the Iraqi population believe attacks against American troops are justified. I believe we need to turn Iraq over to the Iraqis.

I believe before the Iraqi elections, scheduled for mid December, the Iraqi people and the emerging government must be put on notice that the United States will immediately redeploy. All of Iraq must know that Iraq is free. Free from United States occupation. I believe this will send a signal to the Sunnis to join the political process for the good of a "free" Iraq.

My plan calls:

To immediately redeploy U.S. troops consistent with the safety of U.S. forces.
To create a quick reaction force in the region.
To create an over- the- horizon presence of Marines.
To diplomatically pursue security and stability in Iraq

This war needs to be personalized. As I said before I have visited with the severely wounded of this war. They are suffering.

Because we in Congress are charged with sending our sons and daughters into battle, it is our responsibility, our OBLIGATION to speak out for them. That's why I am speaking out.

Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME.

Murtha's Words on Iraq Deployment

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

John Murtha, a Congressman from a neighboring district and a man that I have great respect for had some strong words to say today about the Iraq policy. Hearing these words from a man such as Mr. Murtha really put things into perspective for me.

links for 2005-11-17

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Bob Casey Endorsement

| | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)

Now that the PA primaries are over and we were successful in kicking out one of the corrupt judges behind the 16% pay raise to judicial and legislative elected officials, it's time to focus on the 2006 Senate race between Bob Casey and Rick Santorum. It will come to no surprise that the ShanafeltSector is endorsing Casey.

Casey has performed admirably as both the state Auditor General and Treasurer. He is a staunch advocate for children within the Commonwealth and has been a key proponent pushing for improved Megan's Law and state childcare laws.

In my opinion, Santorum is the most corrupt Senator serving at the moment and if you look at his voting record over the past three months, you can clearly see that the Senator is scrambling for votes. For instance, Santorum has voted 12 times in his illustrious career againist raising the minimum wage, yet last month, he changed his mind and voted for one. That same month, he voted againist a cost of living adjustment for Congress (after seeing the reaction in PA to the state's legislature pay raise vote), yet he voted for the COLA in each of the previous 3 years.

I'll be keeping a close eye on this race, as all Pennsylvanians should. Hopefully this will be a first step in chaning the composition of the current Senate.

links for 2005-11-16

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-15

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-13

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-12

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-11

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-10

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-09

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

HOWTO: MP3 Adapter Into Mercury Sable

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Disclaimer: I'm not good with cars. Had Dave W. not been around, I wouldn't have gotten this to work :)

Due to the lack of content on the Internet regarding how to play MP3s via a digital musical player such as an iPod in a Mercury Sable without using a tape adapter, I wanted to post in detail how I got it to work.

For years, I had used a tape adapter. While this solution is definately easy, it isn't very clean. It just added clutter to an already cluttered car. Once the tape adapter starting showing signs of wear, evidenced by the tape player constantly ejecting the tape adapter, I decided to go for something different.

What I found was an RCA adapter that connects to the amp in the trunk of the Sable (this would probably work for Taurus's too). I bought the USA SPEC DF-FORD1 Adapter from Crutchfield, who I highly recommend. They helped find the item and were very helpful during the problems I faced during installation. Unfortunately, the instructions that came with the item assumed a pretty high level of car audio know-how, which I unfortunately don't have. Shipping took about 3 days.

Now to the install:

Open the trunk. The amp is located above the driver's side rear wheel. To get to it, remove the trunk liner. This can be a little tricky, but once I figured out how the little black buttons can be removed with needle nose pliers, it wasn't too bad. There are 2 cables that come with the adapter. For the Sable, you have to use the one with the black ends. To install the adapter in the amp, put the smaller-ended cable into the right-most open slot. Then, remove the existing speaker cables that are going into the amp (the bunch of cables on the left-most slot on the amp), and plug the speaker cable into the female end on the remaining adapter cable. Then, plug the last existing cable on the adapter cable into the amp. This "Jumper" cable simply provides power to the RCA adapter. Figuring out the jumper cable is what stumped me during install and is what Dave thankfully figured out.

Once that is done, connect the adapter cable into the RCA adapter box and mount it into the trunk using metal screws. At this point, things should be working. You have to buy an minijack to RCA cable to plug the MP3 player in. I found a 20-foot Monster cable from Amazon for a little over $20 and was able to run the cable from the trunk to the front of the car without much trouble. Plug in your MP3 player, switch the radio console to CD-Mode, and you are good to go!

radioZoomOut.jpg


radioZoomOut.jpg

The one thing that I have noticed with this setup is that I have to pretty much have the volume on my MP3 player cranked to the max, while still having the radio set to mid-level volumes. This is much higher than I ever had to set the volume level when I was using the tape adapter.

links for 2005-11-04

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

links for 2005-11-03

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from November 2005 listed from newest to oldest.

October 2005 is the previous archive.

December 2005 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.